The comic book of Journalism has arrived and you can take a look at the first chapter.The Influencing Machine
culturebox:
entries
12
The Goldilocks Number
By Brooke Gladstone
Posted Thursday, May 19, 2011, at 7:32 AM ET
PRINTDISCUSSE-MAILRSSRECOMMEND...REPRINTSSINGLE PAGE

The following comes from Brooke Gladstone's new book, The Influencing Machine: Brooke Gladstone on the Media, illustrated by Josh Neufeld. Read Gladstone's explanation of the book and a first excerpt about journalistic objectivity here. http://www.slate.com/id/2291942?wpisrc=newsletter_tis

This is something that we talked about a short time ago..the use of fictitious numbers were real one are hard to find or the reporter is just lazy.

The real danger of personalised news is that you don't get what you need to know only what you want to know.
The Rise of Filter Bubbles
| from the sound-of-your-own-voice dept.
| posted by samzenpus on Sunday May 15, @23:21 (Censorship)
| https://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/05/16/0044236/The-Rise-of-Filter-Bubbles?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

eldavojohn writes "Eli Pariser gave a talk at TED which posits that
tailoring algorithms are creating 'filter bubbles' around each user,
restricting the information that reaches you to be — unsurprisingly —
only what you want to see. While you might be happy that your preferred
liberal or conservative news hits you, you'll never get to see the
converse. This is because Google, Facebook, newspaper sites and even
Netflix filter what hits you before you get to see it. And since they
give you what you want, you never see the opposing viewpoints or step
outside your comfort zone. It amounts to a claim of censorship through
personalization, and now that every site does it, it's becoming a
problem. Pariser calls for all sites implementing these algorithms to
embed in the algorithms 'some sense of public life' and also have
transparency so you can understand why your Google search might look
different than someone with opposing tastes." Hit the link below to watch
a video of Pariser's talk.

Discuss this story at:
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/05/16/0044236/The-Rise-of-Filter-Bubbles?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email#commentlisting

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Tenth Annual AusCERT Conference Kicks Off
| from the gentlemen-start-your-computers dept.
| posted by samzenpus on Monday May 16, @01:55 (Australia)
| https://it.slashdot.org/story/11/05/16/0259231/Tenth-Annual-AusCERT-Conference-Kicks-Off?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email

What drives the news in the internet age? Here is one report:
Drudge Generates More News Traffic Than Social Media
| from the nobody-cares-about-your-day dept.
| posted by samzenpus on Monday May 09, @11:15 (The Internet)
| https://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/09/157222/Drudge-Generates-More-News-Traffic-Than-Social-Media?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tcd004 writes "A report released today by the Pew Research Center's
Project for Excellence in Journalism shows that the Drudge Report is a
far more important driver of online news traffic than Facebook or
Twitter. In fact, for the top 25 news websites, Twitter barely registers
as a source of traffic. The report hits on several other [0]interesting
findings about news behavior."

Discuss this story at:
https://news.slashdot.org/story/11/05/09/157222/Drudge-Generates-More-News-Traffic-Than-Social-Media?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email#commentlisting

Links:
0. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/05/pew-the-drudge-report-drive-more-top-news-traffic-than-twitter-or-facebook.html